Insights

Google Lighthouse Performance

The Google Lighthouse performance score is a metric that measures the speed and performance of a website. It’s an overall score that ranges from 0 to 100 and is generated based on a number of different performance metrics, such as the time it takes for a website to load, the time it takes for a website to become interactive, the size of the resources used by the website, and other factors that impact the user experience.

A high performance score in Google Lighthouse indicates that a website is fast and responsive, which can lead to a better user experience and improved search engine rankings. On the other hand, a low performance score can indicate that a website is slow and unresponsive, and can negatively impact the user experience.

Mobile Performance
60%
Desktop Performance
92%

Core Web Vitals

Core Web Vitals are a set of specific factors that Google considers important in a webpage’s overall user experience. Core Web Vitals are made up of three specific page speed and user interaction measurements: Largest Contentful PaintFirst Input Delay, and Cumulative Layout Shift.

Pass or fail?

MobileFail
DesktopPass

CWV Breakdown

VitalMobileDesktopTarget
Largest Contentful Paint3.9 s1.6 s< 2.5 s
First Input Delay470 ms90 ms< 100ms
Cumulative Layout Shift00 0.1

Tracking scripts

All the tracking scripts on the site generated ~893 KB of data

A tracking script is a code snippet designed to track the flow of visitors who visit a website. Media, advertising, and analytics organisations will provide a script to add to your website that sends data directly to their servers. This data can then be used to measure goals and conversions, analyse user behaviour, and influence advertising campaigns.

Consider how much of this data you actually need and use? How often do you review the analytics data, and does this inform genuine change? Are you actively running social media campaigns? Consider pausing or removing tracking scripts that aren’t being actively used.

View details
googletagmanager.com 7 608 KB
snap.licdn.com 1 15 KB
bat.bing.com 3 17 KB
connect.facebook.net 2 81 KB
google-analytics.com 1 791 B
analytics.google.com 1 733 B
stats.g.doubleclick.net 1 733 B
9369858.fls.doubleclick.net 2 4 KB
td.doubleclick.net 3 3 KB
ad.doubleclick.net 3 8 KB
googleads.g.doubleclick.net 2 6 KB
js.adsrvr.org 2 14 KB
secure.adnxs.com 1 1 KB
secure.quantserve.com 1 10 KB
acdn.adnxs.com 1 9 KB
google.com 2 1 KB
google.com.au 2 1 KB
8499956.fls.doubleclick.net 2 2 KB
px.ads.linkedin.com 5 5 KB
ib.adnxs.com 2 769 B
pixel.quantserve.com 1 741 B
facebook.com 1 449 B
linkedin.com 1 1 KB
pixel.mediaiqdigital.com 1 119 B
insight.adsrvr.org 1 441 B
match.adsrvr.org 4 3 KB
cm.g.doubleclick.net 1 779 B
pixel.rubiconproject.com 1 2 KB
simage2.pubmatic.com 1 811 B
script.crazyegg.com 4 44 KB
sc-static.net 2 47 KB
vc.hotjar.io 1 305 B
tr.snapchat.com 6 3 KB
pixel.tapad.com 2 2 KB

Opportunities

Optimise images1 MB0.318g

By optimising the following images, roughly 1 MB could be removed from the transfer size, about 38%. This would reduce the CO2 generated per page load from 0.84g grams to 0.52 grams.

Images should be optimised for the web for several reasons:

  1. Reduced file size: Optimizing images can result in a smaller file size, which can help to reduce the amount of data that needs to be downloaded. This can lead to faster page load times and improved performance.
  2. Improved user experience: Optimising images can help to improve the overall user experience, as pages with optimised images load faster and are more responsive.
  3. Lower emissions: Optimising images can help to reduce the emissions associated with data transfer, as less data needs to be transmitted over the network.
  4. Better accessibility: Optimising images can make them more accessible to users with slower connections or limited data plans.
View details
700x400_Brydes-2.png 501 KB 13% 466 KB
brand2024-homepage-desktop.jpg 236 KB 6% 144 KB
session-1-applications-2024-desktop.jpg 217 KB 6% 99 KB
RarestPlant_TiareApetahi_sm.jpg 159 KB 4% 97 KB
pg2024-homepage-desktop.jpg 157 KB 4% 79 KB
HSC-Goodluck-Desktop.jpg 148 KB 4% 93 KB
2024-Financial-Risk-Day-WHATS-ON-500x300.jpg 90 KB 2% 53 KB
plain-language.jpg 84 KB 2% 38 KB
campus-tour-thumbnail.jpg 77 KB 2% 48 KB
dementia-case-study.jpg 75 KB 2% 32 KB
discover-series-s-NatSci-OCT-WHATS-ON-500x300.jpg 65 KB 2% 43 KB
PG-Careers-in-Focus-Whats-ON-500x300.jpg 60 KB 2% 39 KB
anxiety700x400.jpg 59 KB 2% 28 KB
boy-phone.jpg 42 KB 1% 21 KB
fire.jpg 39 KB 1% 19 KB
partner-with-us.jpg 34 KB 1% 22 KB
image1.jpg 34 KB 1% 28 KB
Sleep-Seminar-Series_no-text_WHATS-ON-500x300.jpg 34 KB 1% 23 KB
image4.jpg 34 KB 1% 14 KB
research-with-us.jpg 31 KB 1% 20 KB
image3.jpg 29 KB 1% 16 KB
Subset large font files318 KB0.071g

Fonts should be subsetted to reduce the file size, improve performance, and reduce emissions. Subsetting a font involves removing any characters that are not needed for a particular use case, resulting in a smaller file size and faster page load times. Some specific reasons why fonts should be subsetted include:

  1. Reduced file size: Subsetting a font removes any unused characters, which can result in a smaller file size. This can help to reduce the amount of data that needs to be downloaded, leading to faster page load times and lower emissions.
  2. Improved performance: Fonts that are subsetted are faster to load and render than fonts that are not subsetted. This can help to improve the overall performance of a website, leading to a better user experience.

Overall, subsetting fonts is a good practice for anyone looking to optimize the performance and reduce the emissions of a website of a website.

View details
NationalWeb-LightItalic.woff ~106 KB ~89 KB
NationalWeb-Extrabold.woff ~100 KB ~82 KB
NationalWeb-Medium.woff ~93 KB ~75 KB
NationalWeb-Book.woff ~89 KB ~72 KB
Convert font files to woff2295 KB

WOFF2 is considered to be the best font format for web use because it provides a good balance of file size and compatibility. Some specific reasons why WOFF2 is a good font format include:

  1. Small file size: WOFF2 is a compressed font format, which means that it has a smaller file size compared to other font formats like TTF or OTF. This is important for web use because smaller file sizes can help to reduce the amount of data that needs to be downloaded, leading to faster page load times.
  2. High-quality font rendering: WOFF2 provides high-quality font rendering, making it a good choice for use on the web.

It’s worth noting that WOFF2 is not the only font format that can be used on the web, and there may be cases where other formats like WOFF or TTF are more suitable, depending on the specific requirements of the website. However, for most cases, WOFF2 is considered to be the best font format for web use due to its combination of small file size, good browser support, and high-quality font rendering.

View details
NationalWeb-Medium.woff woff
NationalWeb-Extrabold.woff woff
NationalWeb-Book.woff woff
NationalWeb-LightItalic.woff woff
Remove third party font files

Font files should be loaded from the same hosting as the website because

  1. Increased loading time: Third-party sub-resources, such as scripts, fonts, or images, need to be downloaded from a separate server before they can be displayed on the website. This can increase the overall loading time of the page, leading to a slower user experience.
  2. Dependence on external servers: The loading of third-party subresources is dependent on the availability and performance of the external servers that host them. If these servers are slow or unavailable, it can result in slow page loading times or even errors.
  3. Increased risk of security threats: Third-party subresources can introduce security risks to a website, as they can contain malicious code or be used to track user activity.
View details
dev.mq.edu.au NationalWeb-Medium.woff
dev.mq.edu.au NationalWeb-Extrabold.woff
dev.mq.edu.au NationalWeb-Book.woff
dev.mq.edu.au NationalWeb-LightItalic.woff
Largest Contentful Paint

Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

MobileDesktop
Score53%75%
Timing3.9 s1.6 s
Total Blocking Time

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric.

MobileDesktop
Score6%97%
Timing2,150 ms100 ms
Speed Index

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric.

MobileDesktop
Score98%95%
Timing2.4 s1.1 s
Time to Interactive

Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric.

MobileDesktop
Score2%70%
Timing20.4 s3.5 s
Max Potential First Input Delay

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric.

MobileDesktop
Score10%98%
Timing470 ms90 ms