Scientific Advisory Board
Insights
Summary
- Pages monitored
- 7
- Average mobile transfer size
- 100 KB
- Average desktop transfer size
- 100 KB
Resource Summary
Type | |||
---|---|---|---|
document | 6 | 15.31 KB | 3% |
stylesheet | 5 | 46.20 KB | 8% |
script | 5 | 249.58 KB | 43% |
image | 59 | 239.34 KB | 41% |
font | 1 | 33.16 KB | 6% |
xhr | 1 | 897.00 B | 0% |
fetch | 1 | 796.00 B | 0% |
Google Lighthouse average scores
Category | Mobile | Desktop |
---|---|---|
Performance | 92% | 99% |
Accessibility | 61% | 62% |
SEO | 76% | 76% |
Best Practices | 86% | 89% |
PWA | ? | ? |
Emissions
Form Factor | Average CO2 | Average rating |
---|---|---|
Mobile | 0.02g | A+ |
Desktop | 0.02g | A+ |
Insights
Google Lighthouse Performance
The Google Lighthouse performance score is a metric that measures the speed and performance of a website. It’s an overall score that ranges from 0 to 100 and is generated based on a number of different performance metrics, such as the time it takes for a website to load, the time it takes for a website to become interactive, the size of the resources used by the website, and other factors that impact the user experience.
A high performance score in Google Lighthouse indicates that a website is fast and responsive, which can lead to a better user experience and improved search engine rankings. On the other hand, a low performance score can indicate that a website is slow and unresponsive, and can negatively impact the user experience.
- Mobile Performance
- 100%
- Desktop Performance
- 100%
Core Web Vitals
Core Web Vitals are a set of specific factors that Google considers important in a webpage’s overall user experience. Core Web Vitals are made up of three specific page speed and user interaction measurements: Largest Contentful Paint, First Input Delay, and Cumulative Layout Shift.
Pass or fail?
Mobile | Pass |
---|---|
Desktop | Pass |
CWV Breakdown
Vital | Mobile | Desktop | Target |
---|---|---|---|
Largest Contentful Paint | 0.8 s | 0.2 s | < 2.5 s |
First Input Delay | 60 ms | 20 ms | < 100ms |
Cumulative Layout Shift | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
Opportunities
Speed Index
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Score | 98% | 99% |
Timing | 2.5 s | 0.8 s |
Insights
Carbon footprint
The carbon footprint of a website can be calculated by estimating the amount of energy consumed by the data center hosting the website, as well as the energy consumed by users accessing the site. Factors that can influence a website’s carbon footprint include the size of the site, the amount of traffic it receives, and the technology and hosting infrastructure used to host the site.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Rating | A+ | A+ |
Green Hosting | Yes | Yes |
Cleaner than | 100% | 100% |
CO2 per page load | 0g | 0g |
CO2 wasted per page load | ~0 | ~0 |
Transfer size | 372.00B | 372.00B |
Transfer size percentile | 1% | 1% |
Size wasted | 0.00 B | 0.00 B |
Sustainable hosting
By hosting this site on a server powered by renewable energy, this page generated ~0grams of CO2 instead of ~0grams of CO2.
Sustainable web hosting refers to hosting services that are designed to minimise their impact on the environment and to promote sustainability. This can include using renewable energy sources, reducing waste and emissions, and implementing best practices for energy efficiency.
Sustainable web hosting providers aim to reduce their carbon footprint by using energy-efficient server hardware, data centres, and networking equipment, as well as implementing environmentally friendly policies and practices. For example, some providers may use renewable energy sources, such as wind or solar power, to power their data centres, or they may use high-efficiency cooling systems to reduce energy consumption.
Insights
Google Lighthouse Accessibility
The accessibility score in Google Lighthouse is a metric that measures how well a website is designed for users with disabilities. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better accessibility.
Google Lighthouse evaluates a website’s accessibility based on a number of different factors, such as the presence of alternative text for images, the use of semantic HTML, the ability to navigate the page using only a keyboard, and the use of appropriate color contrasts.
A high accessibility score in Google Lighthouse indicates that a website is well-designed for users with disabilities and provides an inclusive user experience. On the other hand, a low accessibility score can indicate that a website has barriers that make it difficult or impossible for some users to access and use the content.
In automated testing, this page scored 80% for accessibility on desktop. Keep in mind that automated accessibility testing is not perfect and that manual tests, use case testing, or usability testing should be completed as well.
- Mobile Accessibility
- 55%
- Desktop Accessibility
- 55%
Opportunities
Document doesn't have a <title>
element
The title gives screen reader users an overview of the page, and search engine users rely on it heavily to determine if a page is relevant to their search. Learn more about document titles.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Grade | Fail | Fail |
<html>
element does not have a [lang]
attribute
If a page doesn't specify a lang
attribute, a screen reader assumes that the page is in the default language that the user chose when setting up the screen reader. If the page isn't actually in the default language, then the screen reader might not announce the page's text correctly. Learn more about the lang
attribute.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Grade | Fail | Fail |
Insights
Google Lighthouse Best Practices
Google Lighthouse evaluates a website’s best practices based on a number of different factors, such as the use of HTTPS encryption, the use of efficient caching policies, the implementation of modern web technologies, and the avoidance of deprecated technologies.
A high best practices score in Google Lighthouse indicates that a website is well-designed and follows best practices for web development, which can lead to better performance, security, and accessibility. On the other hand, a low best practices score can indicate that a website has room for improvement in terms of following best practices.
- Mobile Best Practices
- 82%
- Desktop Best Practices
- 85%
Google Lighthouse SEO
Google Lighthouse evaluates a website’s SEO based on a number of different factors, such as the presence of title and description tags, the use of header tags, the presence of structured data, the use of image alt tags, and the use of crawlable links.
A high SEO score in Google Lighthouse indicates that a website is well-optimized for search engines, which can help to improve its visibility in search results and increase its organic traffic. On the other hand, a low SEO score can indicate that a website has room for improvement in terms of its optimization for search engines.
While a high SEO score can help to improve a website’s visibility in search results, it’s not a guarantee of higher rankings, as search engine algorithms take many other factors into account when determining the ranking of a website.
- Mobile SEO
- 73%
- Desktop SEO
- 73%
Cost to load
Price per GB (USD) | $3.12 |
---|---|
Price per GB (Local) | 3.12 USD |
Price to load PPV (USD) | $0 |
Price to load PPV (Local) | 0 USD |
2022 Mobile data pricing sourced from cable.co.uk
Opportunities
Security headers to set1/6
HTTP security headers are special HTTP headers that can be added to a website’s response to help improve its security. They are important because they can help to protect a website and its users from various security threats, such as cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, and other types of malicious activity.
It’s important to note, however, that implementing HTTP security headers is just one aspect of a comprehensive security strategy, and that other measures, such as regular software updates, secure coding practices, and regular security audits, are also important for maintaining a secure website.
View details
It's important to note, however, that implementing HTTP security headers is just one aspect of a comprehensive security strategy, and that other measures, such as regular software updates, secure coding practices, and regular security audits, are also important for maintaining a secure website.
Document doesn't have a <title>
element
The title gives screen reader users an overview of the page, and search engine users rely on it heavily to determine if a page is relevant to their search. Learn more about document titles.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Grade | Fail | Fail |
Document does not have a meta description
Meta descriptions may be included in search results to concisely summarize page content. Learn more about the meta description.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Grade | Fail | Fail |
Page has unsuccessful HTTP status code
Pages with unsuccessful HTTP status codes may not be indexed properly. Learn more about HTTP status codes.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Grade | Fail | Fail |
Timing | 404 | 404 |
Page lacks the HTML doctype, thus triggering quirks-mode
Specifying a doctype prevents the browser from switching to quirks-mode. Learn more about the doctype declaration.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Grade | Fail | Fail |
Charset declaration is missing or occurs too late in the HTML
A character encoding declaration is required. It can be done with a <meta>
tag in the first 1024 bytes of the HTML or in the Content-Type HTTP response header. Learn more about declaring the character encoding.
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Grade | Fail | Fail |
Browser errors were logged to the console
Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit
Mobile | Desktop | |
---|---|---|
Grade | Fail | Fail |
Home | Accessibility 83% | Lighthouse Performance Score 90% | Transfer size 715KB | CO2 emitted per page view 0.16g | Rating A |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
About | Accessibility 55% | Lighthouse Performance Score 100% | Transfer size 372B | CO2 emitted per page view 0g | Rating A+ |
Executive Leadership Team | Accessibility 55% | Lighthouse Performance Score 100% | Transfer size 372B | CO2 emitted per page view 0g | Rating A+ |
Scientific Advisory Board | Accessibility 55% | Lighthouse Performance Score 100% | Transfer size 372B | CO2 emitted per page view 0g | Rating A+ |
Accreditation FAQs | Accessibility 76% | Lighthouse Performance Score 96% | Transfer size 379KB | CO2 emitted per page view 0.08g | Rating A+ |
Eco-Friendly Website Accreditation | Accessibility 55% | Lighthouse Performance Score 100% | Transfer size 372B | CO2 emitted per page view 0g | Rating A+ |
Partners | Accessibility 80% | Lighthouse Performance Score 95% | Transfer size 321KB | CO2 emitted per page view 0.07g | Rating A+ |